The NxLabs Body Challenge Blog

Training Methods and Modalities – Body Part Split Training

Submitted by admin on June 5th, 2009
Perhaps the most prolific and often used form of weight training in the iron game is the Body Part Split (BPS). While I’m sure most of you reading this have used this BPS system at one time or another (frankly I’m betting most of you have never used anything BUT this style of training) I’ll still give a brief explanation before delving into the benefits and drawbacks.Essentially BPS has you training each major muscle grouping with its own dedicated workout on a particular day. For example Monday: Chest day (it’s universal don’t you know?!) Tuesday: Back day, Wednesday: Legs, and so on. Typically you’d be performing anywhere from 3 – 6 exercises per body part.

With that simple description out of the way let’s delve into some of the pros and cons of BPS training:

Pros 
  • Useful for biasing lagging or weak body points in physique or performance.
  • Can provide for greater intensity in a given time frame.
  • ALMOST universally accepted as the most effective method for competitive bodybuilding (but I’m personally not convinced).
  • Can possibly build greater muscular endurance of a particular joint activator.
  • Easier to involve intensity tools (e.g., drop sets, forced reps and rest-pause).
  • Often causes a feeling of muscle soreness in the days following a workout (this is really a matter of personal preference but I kinda like that feeling!).
  • Usually uses less integrated movements (see my Functional Continuum Part I and II articles for examples). Therefore some exercises might be easier to learn for beginners.
Cons 
  • The compounding nature of stress, from doing multiple exercises per body part, can force an accommodation by reducing intensity and loads used.
  • Probably not the best choice for those looking to improve athleticism and conditioning (although since most high school coaches/gym teachers aren’t aware of other methods, this is all they teach to their athletes).
  • May not provide the optimal training stimulus to body parts requiring greater training frequency or volume (you usually only train each body part once per week).
  • Usually requires a spotter to help with many lifts.
  • Often criticized as only being good for building “non-functional” (it’s in quotes people!) muscle.
A sample workout might look something like this:
Day 1 – Legs
Squat

Leg Extensions

Stiff Leg Deadlifts

Standing Calf Raises

Day 2 – Chest
DB Bench Press

Cable Flyes

Decline Barbell Press

Explosive Push-Ups

Day 3 – Back
Deadlifts or Bent-Over Rows

Chin Ups or Pull-Downs

Single-Arm Rows

Straight Arm Pull Downs

Day 4 – Shoulders
Standing Dumbell Press

Cable Side Raises

Cable Front Raises

Seated Barbell Press

Day 5 – Arms
Close Grip Barbell Press

Lying Dumbell Extensions

Single Arm Cable Pressdowns

Standing Barbell Arm Curls

Dumbell Hammer Curls

Barbell Preacher Bench Curls

I intentionally didn’t include any sets or rep scenarios, for as always it depends on what you’re trying to accomplish. However I will suggest no matter what your goals, a couple of warm up sets for the first exercise per day is probably a very good idea.

It should go without saying there is no one perfect way to train. In fact there isn’t a right or wrong way to train, it’s all about the difference in stimulus and how you adapt to it.

Keep this information in mind as we delve deeper into this series and try to use your head in figuring out what to do next.

Next installment we’ll examine the flip side of BPS and examine Total Body Training.

Share this article:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • TwitThis

Tags: , ,

9 Responses to “Training Methods and Modalities – Body Part Split Training”

  1. [...] been the seeming lack of volume per body part. The concern stems from the comparison of traditional Body Part Split (BPS) training wherein you perform multiple exercises (say three to five) for each body part, [...]

  2. Fernando Silva says:

    Just got your system, which was recomended by a friend. I’m not able to find the description of the exercises on the site.

  3. Mario says:

    Fernando,

    Which exercises are you having difficulty with? Perhaps I can help explain some of them to you.

    M.

  4. There’s clearly a great deal to know about this. I think you made some good points in Characteristics also.
    Keep operating , great occupation!

  5. Guy says:

    While I believe in most of what you believe, there are minor things I would do differently. But, I appreciate your being able to make clear a great deal of my feelings on this matter.

    http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/cibzu/extense_male_enhancement/

  6. I really must say it’s quite refreshing to check out a rather ‘different’ blog like this, good job. I look forward to coming back fairly soon to see if you have uploaded another comment.

  7. David Tuffey says:

    I’ve got to state it’s rather a novelty to check out a somewhat original blog like yours, excellent effort. I look forward to dropping by frequently to see if you have uploaded another comment.

  8. I really must make the comment that it is really quite refreshing to come across a relatively unique blog like this, excellent effort. I expect I’ll be coming back frequently. BTW I’ll be looking out for your next comment then.

  9. I’ve got to admit it’s rather pleasing to discover a ‘different’ blog like this, good effort. I I hope to be visiting again soon and I’ll be looking to see if you’ve made another comment at that time.