The NxLabs Body Challenge Blog

Archive for April, 2009

The Functional Continuum Part II

Thursday, April 30th, 2009
Last week we discussed the seemingly ‘circus act’ quality of many so called ‘functional’ movements, and how unstable surface training might actually be detrimental to performance. This instalment will take a quick look at the other side of the spectrum by virtue of ‘isolation’ exercises.

Any bodybuilder wannabe worth his/her salt would have at one time or another referred to “isolating a muscle for peak gains”. What I want to discuss is how this notion of muscular isolation is a little silly. You see, no matter how hard you try you can’t truly isolate a muscle. Even if you try to remove all other joint activity (i.e. a preacher bench curl) you’ll never get just one muscle to work independent of all others, the body simply doesn’t work that way.

Imagine your muscles working as a highly trained philharmonic orchestra playing a symphony. There might be times in the performance were the conductor (you) want to bias or bring up certain instruments in volume (muscular focus) and make others take a back seat by reducing their loudness. This dynamic contrast is kind of how your body works. While you can bias and get a particular muscle group to work a little harder by mechanically increasing the load on a particular joint that same muscle group doesn’t actually work strictly on its own. All the other muscles in the area (and some no where near it!) work to provide a platform from which your target muscle group can contract against (like an instrumental solo in an orchestral piece). Further as the position of the joint in question (remember muscles function to move joints and their associated bones) changes so does the neural hand-off of the muscular bias from one to another. In other words, one muscle changes roles and passes off the bulk of the activation stimulus towards force opposition for a slightly different role (i.e. joint management or plane maintenance) and so on down the line as the movement is completed and repeated.

Sufficed to say, aside from the complexities of the above explanation, muscular isolation while nice in thought is more myth than reality (kinda like the male ‘G’ spot!). Our muscles all work in a highly orchestrated and organized manner to make any and all movement possible.

Still need more proof? Ok, try doing a standing barbell curl while I come over and take a scalpel to your Achilles tendon. Assuming you get past the shock and initial pain you’ll be hard pressed to generate enough tension in your body for your elbow flexors (the muscles that bend your elbow) to contract against! See, no isolation!

Ok, so what does this mean? It means you need to be very aware of what’s going on inside your body at all times. Just because you’re moving a weight doesn’t mean you’re accomplishing what you think you might be or what the ‘program’ says. Again, I encourage you to be aware of your body, really feel what is going on and think about the movements you are performing. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, weight training is so much more than just moving weights around. It’s about proper and effective activation of muscles through the appreciation of structural anatomy. Sure, many people get some benefit from throwing weights around in the gym with little if any regard for the things I’ve been discussing in the last couple of articles, but man, just think how much more you can accomplish when you consider all the factors! Imagine how many years of safe, injury-free lifting you can benefit from when you respect the structure of the body and the way physical forces affect it. It brings a tear to my eye I tell ya!

So I encourage you again, think, use your head, READ and ask lots and lots of questions. Train smart, train hard, and train safe.

 

Spice Up Your Fat Loss

Monday, April 27th, 2009

The thought of dieting for fat loss conjures up images of bland, boring foods, such as plain chicken breast and tuna. Not the most appealing of thoughts, but hey, no one ever said dieting was fun. Seasoned bodybuilders have learned to make these foods more palatable by adding spices to increase flavor and enjoyment.

A recent research paper also supports adding spices to food not only increases flavor, but also thermogenesis. Consumption of capsaicin, black pepper and ginger all have been shown to increase thermogenesis through several mechanisms and most commonly through the stimulation of catecholamine release. Catecholamines, such as epinephrine and norepinephrine (a.k.a. adrenaline and noradrenaline), are chemical messengers released from the adrenal glands and nerve endings, which stimulate fat cells to breakdown and release fat.

So if you’re planning on getting ripped this spring, try adding these spices to your food, not only for the flavor, but for the fat loss as well.

Physiol Behav. 2006 Aug 30; 89(1):85-91

The Functional Continuum (or is that the Functional Conundrum?) Part I

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

If I hear one more trainer, or read one more article telling me I must train functionally I swear I’m going to vomit! What does functional even mean? From what I can tell from most of these so called “experts” is that “functional training” is akin to precariously perching yourself on an unstable surface whilst balancing a broomstick on end in one hand and whipping yourself silly with a ‘bodyblade’ with the other hand!

Pardon my foray into the sublime for a moment but seriously, it seems the more creative and weird the exercise many trainers come up with the more ‘functional’ they claim it to be! Guess what I say? SHENNANIGANS!! (bet you didn’t see that one coming?!)

Functional training isn’t about how silly you can make an exercise look. It isn’t about how many Bosu balls you can jump up and down on. It isn’t even about working your ‘core’ whatever the heck that is! ($20 bucks to the first person who can point to their ‘core’ muscles!) Functional training is really whatever exercise you do that makes you better at whatever it is you want to do! In other words if your personal ambition is to become better at standing on an unstable surface in the gym while balancing odd paraphernalia in your hands and whistling Dixie all at the same time, and you train this particular ‘skill’ then you my friend are training in a functional manner! However if you think that doing so will somehow translate into increasing your ability to play football for example, then you might want to lay down and have a nap, I promise I’ll wake you when the circus comes to town for your audition!

Often times we confuse balance training with functional training. Somehow, somewhere, someone figured that training on an unstable surface might have some real world transfer to sports. While this idea in and of itself isn’t necessarily wrong, there isn’t a heck of a lot of research to support this contention. But since lack of evidence rarely stands in the way of a ‘good idea’ the silly trend of balance boards and half balls and other implements began.

Here is my take: Since most sports performance improves with greater strength your training efforts should likely be focused on increasing your strength. Pushing off an unstable surface in say a squat or a lunge position actually limits your ability to generate force. Limiting your force output means you likely are not generating enough effort to produce strength gains. Now you might possibly be increasing certain elements of muscular endurance but I ask “What’s the point of having endurance if you have no strength or speed to endure?” (Credit to world renowned sprinting coach Charlie Francis for that one.)

Is there a benefit to unstable surface training? I think so, but I’d likely reserve it for rehabilitative applications. I really don’t see a tremendous benefit to so-called balance training or ‘over-speed’ training for most athletes. Our CNS simply doesn’t work that way. Your body will always do what it can to get the job you’re asking of it done. If you’re asking your body to balance on a ball it will do it’s damndest to do just that. However, if an imbalance in muscular force production exist somewhere in your body, this weakness to strength ratio disparity will only increase! Your body will compensate with the stronger active muscles and continue to bypass the weaker muscles which haven’t been turned on yet. Even worse since the larger more powerful muscles can already handle that reduced level of force production they really aren’t benefiting much from such activity. Indentify these weaker or ‘off’ muscles, get them activated and watch your performance increase.

Next instalment we’ll look at the other side of the Functional Continuum by examining so-called ‘isolation’ movements and see why there really is no such thing and how you can use a simple concept to ‘turn on’ those lagging muscles.

*Credit to my lovely wife Deyra for the idea for this instalment.

Muscle Building Nutrition Q&A – Part 4

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009
Ok, so we’ve established answers to the following questions in the first three parts of this series so far:
1. Would I have to do a bulk?
2. How long would I bulk for?

Alright, how about some practical steps? We’re not going to get into the training aspect of this right now as it’s a rather varied topic, so we’ll just keep the focus on nutrition – which really is what will be the final determinant of gains. By that I mean, I don’t care how hard you’re training, if you’re not eating enough to support muscle growth, you’re not going to be gaining size. Period. (exception to the rule – newbies and those new to ‘effective training’)

To go back to another point made in one of the previous posts – expect to gain at least some bodyfat. If you expect to stay lean, expect to stay the same. I’ll give you a few case examples:

1. I was emailing back and forth with a client prospect who has been solely focused on muscle gain for many, many months. She works with another trainer. In our communications, she ended up sending me her pre- and current ‘bulking’ pictures for review. First thing I noticed? Nothing. Literally, I couldn’t tell a difference at all. I asked her what the difference in weight was. The answer? One pound. I believe this was over the course of about nine months. ONE POUND. Now, it’d be great if there was some massive recompositioning here but there wasn’t – no visible changes. I questioned her on this and she said her trainer wants to her stay lean while gaining size.

The results show how effective that strategy is.

2. A client of my own who I worked with for a little over a year. We did a few cut/bulk cycles and yes she gained some body fat during the bulks. But she had a great mindset for all of it (vital necessity in my opinion) and had the big picture in front of her the whole time. The numbers will make my point for me.

November 19/07

Weight – 110 lbs

Waist – 30 1/4

Hips – 33 3/4

Thighs – 17

Chest – 31 1/2

Arms – 9 1/2

Calf – 10 1/2

Contrast that to her final biweekly:

September 16/08

Weight – 109.4 lbs

Waist – 24 1/4

Hips – 33 1/4

Thighs – 17 3/4

Chest – 32 1/4

Arms – 10

Calf – 11

The most glaring point there is that she weighs basically the same as her starting weight – but her waist is 6 inches smaller. Now that’s a recomp.

A successful bulk is obviously determined by the results gained – hopefully you’ve added some muscle and not too much fat. It’s fine to gain, gain, gain, but if you end up the same bodyweight and the same bodyfat – basically you look the same as you did pre-bulk – it doesn’t seem like you did very well. Now if you end up the same bodyweight, but you’re even leaner (see Case #2 above) then you definitely had a successful run. Gaining 20lbs only to lose 20lbs and look no different – that’s not a good bulk.

How much do I need to eat?

Enough!

You need to definitely have more energy coming in than going out. Again, insufficient food intake = no gains. Look around the gym – most people there are trying to gain some muscle, get stronger, etc. Are they? They appear to be working pretty hard and yet, a year from now, chances are they’ll look no different. Something isn’t working. Could it be what they’re doing/eating outside of the gym? Could it be that they train hard for 45 minutes (trying to build muscle?) and then they hop on the elliptical for 30 minutes PWO (trying to get the cuts?). It doesn’t work.

So how much food? I generally recommend that you start at an assumed maintenance intake. I say assumed because all of the predictive equations are just estimates. They’re not going to necessarily be 100% accurate, but it’s a starting place for us. If you’re not coming off a hard diet, around 15x total bodyweight is a good ball part. Pay attention to results though – if you’re gaining (beyond water and glycogen) then clearly this is not maintenance. If you’re coming off a hard diet, start a bit lower as metabolism will be slightly depressed. Stay there for two weeks and reassess. Did the scale go up? Go down? Stay the same? Adjust accordingly. Assuming you were at maintenance, start adding calories. Again, we’re trying to avoid getting too sloppy so take it easy and just systematically raise them. Start at 10% above maintenance, stay there for a bit, and reassess. What’s happening? Nothing? Add another 10%. You basically continue to add calories until you start to see an upward trend on the scale, but not so quickly upward that it’s clear (in the context of expected rates of muscle gain) that you’re gaining too much fat per given pound of weight gain. If you are gaining too much fat, scale the calories back a bit. It’s all about a simple outcome based approach. Base your adjustments on your results.

Erik Ledin
www.leanbodiesconsulting.com
 

 

 

Low Carb Diets vs. Low Fat Diets

Monday, April 20th, 2009

Let the debate between low carb and low fat diets end – science has determined the winner! In a four-month study conducted at the University of Cincinnati, 50 obese test subjects were divided into two calorie-restricted groups: 1) low carb and 2) low fat. The low-carb dieters followed an average protein/carb/fat ratio of 28/15/57 for the first two months and a ratio of 24/24/52 for the last two months. While subjects following the low fat diet had a macronutrient ratio of 18/53/29 for the first two months and 20/48/32 for last two.

What’s important note is that there was no significant difference in total calorie intake between each group. In spite of this, the difference in macronutrient breakdown showed a significant difference in overall weight loss and body fat reduction. By the end of testing, results showed that the low-carb subjects lost more body weight (21.6 vs. 13.5 pounds) and fat (13.7 vs. 7.1 pounds) than those following a low-fat diet!

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Mar; 90(3):1475-82.

Flexibility vs. Mobility

Friday, April 17th, 2009
Another very popular request I get is to recommend the best method to improve one’s flexibility. As usual my first question back is “Why do you want to improve your flexibility?” You see most people don’t really have a good answer other than because they think they should have some arbitrary measure of flexibility. Again as usual I call Shenannigans! Most people don’t understand the difference between flexibility, which I define as the ability to achieve a certain range of motion or position, and mobility which I consider the capacity to control your joints in those same positions. Simply put in layman’s terms, yeah you can touch your nose to your knees, but if you have to get your buddy Big Tony to sit on your neck to do so what’s the point?!

I fail to see the positive benefits of simply passively forcing a limb into a position (typical of most stretching modalities) when you can’t demonstrate solid control over your joints in that same position. I see this approach as flawed, why compromise future mobility and joint stability for hyper-flexibility now? If you are a gymnast or circus performer of some kind then this might be required and/or desired, but for most of us this simply isn’t the case as we likely don’t want to be dependant on canes and crutches to get around at the age of 40.

Consider carefully what your goals are and act accordingly

 

Water – Nature’s Fat Burner

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Looking for an easy way to increase your metabolism and burn off more calories? Try drinking water. A study conducted in Germany showed that subjects who consumed 500 mL (2 cups) of water increased their resting energy expenditure by 30% after 10 minutes of consumption with the effect lasting up to 40 minutes. This study also found that the increase in calorie burning came from fat in men and from carbohydrates in women. The researchers speculate that consumption of 2 liters (8 cups) of water a day would additionally help burn off close to 100 kcal/day.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Dec; 88(12):6015-9

NxLabs Body Challenge Podcast Episode 5

Monday, April 13th, 2009

In the fifth episode of the NxLabs Body Challenge Podcast, Nathan gives you some advice on getting shredded and holding onto that muscle you worked so hard to build.

Watching calories, eating the right foods, and drinking plenty of water are all ways to get you ripped for the NxLabs Body Challenge.

If you like the Body Challenge Podcast, you can subscribe to them for regular updates through RSS or iTunes.

Maintaining Focus

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Even someone as hardcore as myself has those days where staying in bed is a lot more appealing than hitting the weights. No matter how motivated or inspired you’ve been, there will come a day when you just wanna say F it! The first step to overcoming this problem is admitting that it exists. And no I’m not talkin’ “My name is Jay and I am a quitter.”

The best way to get back on track is setting goals – small achievable stepping stones to get you to that ultimate prize at the end. While you might already have a major goal in mind like a contest or maxxing out your bench, larger goals can seem unattainable and can de-motivate you. When your morning alarm starts feeling like the beginning of a prison sentence, make your goals smaller and easier to attain. Add an extra exercise to each training session BEFORE you leap right into another whole session. Bump your weights up by 5 pounds instead of expecting to go right to a 45 pound plate. Go from level 5 to level 6 on the treadmill instead of expecting to run a marathon in a week. Once you’ve set these smaller more reasonable goals, be sure to also reward yourself. Giving yourself something to look forward to can keep you motivated, like a new protein flavor or an extra hour of sleep on the weekend. The key is making sure the reward is not a punishment for your body, but more like a dessert.

I tend to use my fridge for more than just a place to keep chicken breasts, when I need motivation. I’ll put a motivating picture up there or even write my goal for the week down so I see it EVERY day. Keep a running list of all the goals you completed. The longer the list gets – you’ll see how much more motivated you get.

Whey Protein Promotes Weight Loss

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

It’s no secret that whey protein helps increase muscle mass and strength, but a preliminary study presented at the Experimental Biology Conference has just revealed that it also aids in fat loss.

In this six-month study, 90 overweight subjects were divided between three supplement groups: 1) 60 grams of whey protein per day, 2) 60 grams of soy protein per day, or 3) 60 grams of carbohydrates per day. Each group consumed their given supplement in addition to their regular diet and did not follow a prescribed training program. They simple added the supplement on top of their diet and carried on their life as they normally would. The results showed that the group taking the whey protein lost the greatest amount of weight, which was 5 pounds more than those in the carbohydrate group.

Experimental Biology, San Francisco, CA, April, 2006